Versions Compared

Version Old Version 8 New Version Current
Changes made by

Anthony Thornton

Donna Fitzsimmons

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Panel
panelIconIdatlassian-info
panelIcon:info:
bgColor#F4F5F7

Discussion leader(s)

...

Brief Summary

Spoke with Rakulan from Bayer

Asked him his thoughts on the following points.

Industry using open-source vs commercial codes

  • Transfer time to swap from DEM code already using

    • Add geometries

    • Add calibrated materials

...

Important Links

Tip

Key Achievements

  1. Detailed discussion with Rakulan from Bayer about industry needs for DEM

  2. Creation of benchmark list for industry Decided on case studies for validation - link to page

  3. Confirmed ideas of first focus group session

Focus for next period

  1. Arrange the first focus group session - CHoPS?

  2. Create a questionnaire

  3. Increase industry participation

Note

Input needed from other WGs

  1. List Compare list of case study validation tests with other WGs were discussing

Info

Key contributors

  1. Rakulan Sivanesapillai

  2. Damla

  3. Anthony Thornton

  4. Luca

  5. JW

  6. DeepakJan-Willem Bisschop

  7. Luca Orefice

  8. Anthony Thornton

  9. Deepak Tunuguntla

  10. Damla Serper

  11. Denys Miroshnychenko

Brief Summary

During the ON-DEM Inaugural Conference, a working group discussion was held which began with a presentation by Jan-Willem Bisschop on the MercuryCloud web environment, which allows industry to use MercuryDPM through a user-friendly web interface on Amazon Web Services. In the future this platform could potentially be extended to incorporate other open-source codes, especially if they adopt a common file format.

After the presentation, Rakulan Sivanesapillai from Bayer engaged with the academic members in an extensive discussion centred on two main topics:

  • The advantages and disadvantages of industry using open-source versus closed-source codes.

  • Case studies for industry validation.

In the afternoon, the meeting addressed several topics:

  • Establishing industrial focus groups, with the first group hoped to be part of CHoPS.

  • Creating targeted advertisements to encourage greater industrial involvement in the network and with open-source particle simulations.

    • Discussed ideas for a catchy slogan.

Important Links

Add link to:

Case studies

Full meeting minutes