Discussion leader(s)
Key Achievements
Created a mind map of benchmarking problems
Started an overleaf document to detail a full description of benchmarking problems
Focus for next period
Finish the overleaf document i.e. complete the list and description of bench marking problems
Input needed from other WGs
Key contributors
Thomas Weinhart
Vicky (Vasiliki) Dimitriadi
Bruno Chareyre
Hao Shi
Ahmet Talha Gezgin
Yannick Descante
Mostafa Almasraf
Danny van der Haven
Elizabeta Šamec
Deepak Tunuguntla
Anthony Thornton
Dalila Vescovi
Lato Pezo
Dingena Schott
Brief Summary | During the ON-DEM Inaugural Conference Workshops for WG4, following brainstorming and discussion sessions it was decided to classify various benchmarking problems according to their behaviour and boundary conditions (i.e. quasi-static, transient, steady state and/or multi-body, multi-physics and multi-component (material mixture) problems. A mind map, as illustrated in Figure \ref{fig:MindMap} was produced. Note that for clarity purposes, the multi-component problem category was excluded. Key aspects of the discussion included the need to (i) consider the uncertainty of the output resulting from benchmarking problems, (ii) understand and adequately define boundary treatment, initial conditions, contact models and particle shape descriptors (if needed), and (iii) being aware of algorithmic differences between the codes used for benchmarking (these include issues such as integration, contact detection and contact model implementation differences.  |
|---|---|
Important Links | The following overleaf document (started at meeting) contains the full description on the benchmarking problems https://www.overleaf.com/7889254832trdzjvcmyqzv#29f115 |