Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 13 Current »

Discussion leader(s)

Key Achievements

  1. Detailed discussion with Rakulan from Bayer about industry needs for DEM

  2. Decided on case studies for validation - link to page

  3. Confirmed ideas of first focus group session

Focus for next period

  1. Arrange the first focus group session - CHoPS?

  2. Create a questionnaire

  3. Increase industry participation

Input needed from other WGs

  1. Compare list of case study validation tests with other WGs

Key contributors

  1. Rakulan Sivanesapillai

  2. Jan-Willem Bisschop

  3. Luca Orefice

  4. Anthony Thornton

  5. Deepak Tunuguntla

  6. Damla Serper

  7. Denys Miroshnychenko

Brief Summary

The session began with a presentation by Jan-Willem Bisschop on the MercuryCloud web environment, which allows industry to use MercuryDPM through a user-friendly web interface on Amazon Web Services. In the future this platform could potentially be extended to incorporate other open-source codes, especially if they adopt a common file format.

After the presentation, Rakulan Sivanesapillai from Bayer engaged with the academic members in an extensive discussion centred on two main topics:

  • The advantages and disadvantages of industry using open-source versus closed-source codes.

  • Case studies for industry validation.

In the afternoon, the meeting addressed several topics:

  • Establishing industrial focus groups, with the first group hoped to be part of CHoPS.

  • Creating targeted advertisements to encourage greater industrial involvement in the network and with open-source particle simulations.

    • Discussed ideas for a catchy slogan.

Important Links

Add link to:

Case studies

Full meeting minutes

  • No labels