WG4: Review of meeting in Helsinki, Finland on 16th May 2024
- Anthony Thornton
- Donna Fitzsimmons
Discussion leader(s)
@Daniel Barreto
Key Achievements
Created a mind map of benchmarking problems
Started an overleaf document to detail a full description of benchmarking problems
Focus for next period
Finish the overleaf document i.e. complete the list and description of bench marking problems
Brief Summary | During the ON-DEM Inaugural Conference Workshops for WG4, following brainstorming and discussion sessions it was decided to classify various benchmarking problems according to their behaviour and boundary conditions (i.e. quasi-static, transient, steady state and/or multi-body, multi-physics and multi-component (material mixture) problems. A mind map, as illustrated in Figure below was produced. Note that for clarity purposes, the multi-component problem category was excluded. Key aspects of the discussion included the need to (i) consider the uncertainty of the output resulting from benchmarking problems, (ii) understand and adequately define boundary treatment, initial conditions, contact models and particle shape descriptors (if needed), and (iii) being aware of algorithmic differences between the codes used for benchmarking (these include issues such as integration, contact detection and contact model implementation differences.
 Mind map created during workshop. Image created by Vicky Dimitriadi based on the flip charts of the actually meeting.
|
|---|---|
Important Links | The following overleaf document (started at meeting) contains the full description on the benchmarking problems Overleaf, Online LaTeX Editor |